Articles Tagged with South Florida sexual assault lawsuit

Recently, an investigation by CNN spotlighted systematic issues with sexual assaults involving merchant shipping crews and the U.S. Coast Guard personnel responsible for policing them. As longtime civil trial lawyers representing survivors of sexual assault in South Florida, we’ve seen some confusion about how whether U.S. military branches can be sued in civil court for sexual assaults – and by whom. Florida sexual assault lawsuit

Most Florida sexual assault lawsuits name third parties as defendants. These are businesses or organizations or government agencies or employers that had a duty to protect the victim and failed to do so. This negligence is grounds for sexual assault survivors to pursue monetary damages for physical injuries, medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, etc.

With the U.S. military, it’s a little trickier – depending on who is trying to pursue damages. Sexual assault has been a pervasive and long-standing problem in all military branches. According to the 2021 U.S. Department of Defense Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military, the number of sexual assault reports spiked by 13 percent compared to the previous year. Although officials claim steady increases in sexual assault reporting indicate that survivors are more comfortable coming forward, anonymous surveys of troops don’t bear that out. They show that sexual abuse and unwanted sexual contact is on the rise, but fewer are reporting it, and fewer perpetrators are legally punished. Among female service members, 8 percent reported experiencing unwanted sexual contact in 2021. For men, it’s 1.5 percent.

Suing the Military for Sexual Assault is Complicated

Historically, military members haven’t been able to sue for sexual assault that occurred while they were serving. As our West Palm Beach sexual assault lawyers can explain, the U.S. government has for more than 70 years leaned on the Feres doctrine, which bars troops from seeking monetary damages in civil court for injuries sustained in active duty service. The one exception is medical malpractice.

However, that may be changing. Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Splestoser v. Hyten et al that the Feres doctrine (named for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling) was intended only to prevent troops from suing the federal government over injuries sustained in training and combat. It was not, the three-judge appellate panel ruled, intended to apply to sexual assault – because sexual assault doesn’t “conceivably serve any military purpose.”

The Splestoser case definitely moves the needle, but that doesn’t mean the legal floodgates are entirely open. The plaintiff in Splestoser is suing her attacker directly (for an intentional tort) as opposed to the U.S. military directly for some sort of negligence. The alleged assailant is arguing this was under the military’s jurisdiction. His argument is that he shouldn’t be held liable, the military should. But either way, this case opens the door potentially to allowing sexual assault survivors to sue the military and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). The ruling sets a precedent, but there’s no guarantee other federal appellate courts will decide the same. (This was in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal, while Florida is part of the 11th Circuit.) It’s possible other circuits could decide differently in the face of a similar challenge. If that happens, the conflict will have to be certified to the U.S. Supreme Court for resolution.

This brings us to the case highlighted by CNN involving a military academy student aboard a marine merchant ship overseen by the U.S. Coast Guard. (Worth noting: The DOD reports sexual assaults and harassment are on the rise in military academies as well. There were 155 formal reports made during the 2021-2022 school year, though officials suspect hundreds more went unreported.) This case involves a U.S. Merchant Marine Academy student (attending a federal service academy), a private marine merchant, and an employee for that private marine merchant. The U.S. Coast Guard is under fire here because it is supposed to be responsible for law and order on this commercial ship and thousands of others in American ports and waterways. Further, the U.S. Coast Guard vets mariners and offers continued monitoring and enforcement of misconduct on land or while on-the-job. A serious offense could result in the marine merchant being stripped of their credentials. If a merchant mariner is accused of a crime on a U.S. flag ship, it’s the U.S. Coast Guard’s law enforcement division responsible for investigating and pursuing criminal charges. The Coast Guard also has a whole separate administrative division with the duty to investigate misconduct and strip a mariner of credentials for egregious offenses. Continue reading

If you’re filing a Florida sexual assault lawsuit in civil court, there are a number of potential legal hurdles about which you should be aware. West Palm Beach sexual assault lawyer

Before diving into the details, we want to make it clear that the point here isn’t to discourage anyone considering a sex abuse lawsuit. Rather, our goal is to empower. As West Palm Beach attorneys for sexual abuse survivors, we’re fully cognizant of the fact that our clients have already been through so much. Part of our job is to make sure that those clients – and potential clients – have all they need to make informed choices about how best to proceed when it comes to a sexual assault civil lawsuit. That includes carefully explaining some of the legal snags that can stymie a case.

Why File a Florida Sexual Assault Lawsuit in Civil Court?

More than half of women and nearly 1 in 3 men experience sexual violence involving physical contact at some point in their lifetime. Not all incidents are “violent,” but no less damaging for that. (Sometimes it’s even more traumatic when a victim is made to believe they are somehow complicit or responsible.)

Accountability in these cases is often elusive in criminal courts. Even if the alleged abuser or attacker is prosecuted and convicted, the ability of the criminal justice system to compensate survivors is limited. Criminal cases may include an offer of restitution. However, unlike in a civil case, the purpose with this financial compensation isn’t solely to compensate the victim. It’s also intended to serve the rehabilitative goals that the criminal justice system has for defendants – and this doesn’t always align with what’s in the best interests of the victim.

But whatever happens on that end of things, there may be grounds to pursue liability in a civil case – typically from third parties.

Though usually not a direct legal action against the perpetrator, third-party sex abuse cases can be an effective way for victims to obtain:

  • Validation and accountability from third parties that had a responsibility to do more to keep you safe or warn you of the danger.
  • Financial compensation for the very real and very significant impact this has had on your life.
  • A safer future for those in similar scenarios. When third-parties are compelled to pay for failing to protect against the risk of sexual assault when they had a responsibility to do so, they  – and others – will take greater care to do better. Defendants in these cases are often property owners, school administrators, sports teams, and employers. People deserve to be safe in these spaces, and successful third-party liability sexual abuse lawsuits can help achieve that.

It’s true that the probability of winning – and actually collecting a financial judgment – is central to the question of whether pursuing a civil sex abuse case is a prudent choice. But it’s not the only consideration. Our attorneys can help walk you through your objectives, concerns, and strategies to overcome common legal issues.

What Obstacles May Stand in the Way of Justice?

Continue reading

It’s estimated that 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will suffer sexual abuse by an adult by the time they turn 18. For too many, these traumatic incidents burden them as secrets carried with them into adulthood, while abusers walk free and the organizations that enabled them are not held accountable in criminal or civil court. In recent years, so-called “lookback window” laws could change that. South Florida sexual assault lawyer

A proposed Florida lookback window law would give thousands of sexual abuse victims in Florida a renewed opportunity to pursue justice. It failed this past legislative session, but lawmakers are proposing to try again next session. More than a dozen states have passed lookback window laws in recent years allowing victims of childhood sexual assault to pursue litigation against their attackers and others responsible, even decades after the abuse ended.

This most recent session, identical bills SB 946 and HB 23 would have created a one-year look-back window in Florida. Sponsors noted that 75 percent of child sexual abuse victims don’t tell anyone for at least one year. Roughly 50 percent haven’t told anyone after five years. Many are silent for a decade or more, as they grapple with a confusing mix of shame, embarrassment and pain. By the time they’re ready just to talk about it, the statute of limitations has expired. Continue reading

Contact Information